![]() ![]() Music streaming apps can be used provided the driver activates and programs them when they are parked.A driver may not record a video (continuously running dash cams are exempt).A driver may not watch a video unless it is for navigation.A driver may not write, send or read any text messages, e-mails, social media or internet data content.A driver may not send or read any text-based communication unless using voice-based communication that automatically converts message to a written text or is being used for navigation or GPS.Headsets and earpieces can only be worn for communication purposes and not for listening to music or other entertainment.Drivers can only use their phones to make or receive phone calls by using speakerphone, earpiece, wireless headphone, phone is connected to vehicle or an electronic watch. A driver cannot have a phone in their hand or use any part of their body to support their phone.A link to the complete law can be found at The following is a brief description what the law states and some frequently asked questions. The Hands Free Law will take effect on July 1, 2018. The new report notes that text messaging has grown exponentially over the past decade, from an average of 31 million sent per day in 2002, to 6.1 billion per day in 2012, citing data from CTIA - The Wireless Association.House Bill 673 also known as the “Hands Free Law” was passed by the Georgia General Assembly and signed into law by Governor Nathan Deal. In 2010, 18% of all injury crashes involved a distracted driver. ![]() In 2011, 3,331 people were killed and 387,000 injured in distracted-driving crashes, according to the Transportation Department. They're still taking their mental concentration off the road."Ĭorporate officials from iPhone did not reply to a request for comment Android officials declined to comment. And second, it's really the same kind of mental concentration that's involved here. Messages often come out garbled, which can take even more time. First, the technology is not yet perfected. "We have believed that for some time, that voice-activated texting is not any safer. "That is not surprising at all," says John Ulczycki, vice president of the National Safety Council. Drivers in the study reported feeling safer when using a voice-to-text app than when texting manually. Wireless providers and mobile app developers created voice-to-text apps to reduce the effects of manual texting. Drivers took about twice as long to react as when they weren't texting and spent less time looking at the road no matter what texting method they used, the study says. The study found that driver response times were slower no matter which method of texting was used. They each drove four times for about 10 minutes at 30 mph: while not texting at all, while texting manually, while texting with the voice-to-text app on the iPhone, and while doing so with the Android smartphone voice-to-text app. Thestudy involved 43 licensed drivers in a 2009 Ford Explorer. The new study is by the Texas Transportation Institute, which says this is the first research on whether there are driving safety advantages in using voice-to-text apps. New research suggests it's just as unsafe to use a voice-to-text mobile app while driving as it is to text manually. Drivers%27 reaction time using either texting method was about twice as long as not texting at all.Texas Transportation Institute researchers tested 43 drivers in a vehicle on closed road course.New study says voice-to-text mobile apps just as dangerous while driving as sending texts manually. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |